Archive for the ‘Fish’ Category

Efforts to Preserve Snake River Basin Redband Trout

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Trying to Save Redband Trout While Agency Discretion Runs Amok

by Deb Hiller
Redband trout © www.fisheyeguyphotography.com

Redband trout © www.fisheyeguyphotography.com

Snake River Basin (SRB) redband trout are native to the high desert country of southern Idaho, northern Nevada, and eastern Oregon.  This species is uniquely adapted to survive the harsh temperature extremes and reduced water flows of the high desert which are lethal to most other trout.  SRB redband are an important element of the high desert ecosystem.  They are the only native salmonid left in these drainages, and are a significant part of the food chain.  Redband eat insects and other fish.  They in turn are a food source for dippers, king fishers, mink, otters, and great blue herons.

SRB redband trout are also an evolutionary unique genetic resource which could be important to the survival of Snake River steelhead, as well as isolated resident redband populations now also imperiled. Historically SRB redband interbred with the recently listed anadromous Snake River steelhead and produced anadromous fors of SRB redband trout. However, the construction of the Hells Canyon dam complex in the 1960s blocked anadromous fish passage. Consequently Snake River steelhead continue to migrate to and from the ocean, while SRB redband trout reside their entire life inland in the Bruneau, Owhyee, Boise, and other Snake river tributaries. Whereas much of the native anadromous Snake River steelhead, gene pool has been lost to interbreeding with hatchery fish, the native gene pool of the SRB redband trout is still intact. Thus, where native gene pools of SRB redband trout have the ability to produce anadromous forms (were it not for the Hells Canyon Dam complex), SRB redband trout have the potential to provide the genetic diversity necessary for anadromous Snake River steelhead species survival.

Redband, like other species of trout, are found mainly in streams with riparian vegetation and in-stream cover, including undercut banks, large woody debris, and overhanging vegetation. Streamside vegetation should shade at least 75% of the stream surface during the hours of 11:00am to 4:00pm from June to September. Such vegetation provides both shade that maintains the lover water temperatures required by trout during hot, dry summer months, and habitat for insects which redband feed upon. Redband also occupy lower gradient streams and should have access to pools which provide rearing habitat, resting places, overwintering areas, and refuges from floods, drought, and extreme temperatures. (more…)

Climate Change and Cattle: The One-Two Punch for Cutthroat

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010
westslope cutthroat trout

Westslope Cutthroat Trout, photo: copyright Pat Clayton

by Larry Zuckerman, WWP

When Captain Meriwether Lewis spoke of “speckled trout” in his 1805
journal entry at Great Falls, Montana and then again in 1806, at Fort Clatsop near Astoria,
Oregon, he was unaware that he was first to write about these distinctive Western trout, which now bear the species name “clarki”, in honor of expedition partner, Captain William Clark. He also didn’t know he was describing two different subspecies: Westslope cutthroat trout in the Upper Missouri River and coastal cutthroat trout, an anadromous form, from the Columbia River. In fact, “Lewis and Clark’s trout” or Westslope cutthroat trout, the state fish for Idaho and Montana, bears Latinized versions of the brazen explorers’ names – Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi.

There are 14 subspecies of cutthroat trout in the West as described by eminent ichthyologist, Dr. Robert Behnke of Colorado State University. While two are extinct, the remaining 11 Interior subspecies have suffered catastrophic declines. Examining most of the 19th Century accounts of the Interior cutthroat trout, one would find only non-natives like brown trout, brook trout, and rainbow trout at historic sites like the Green River, Rio Grande, and Lake Tahoe. (more…)

FWS Calls for Public Comment for Big Lost River Whitefish Status Review

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

Back in March, Idaho Federal District Court Judge Edward Lodge ordered the Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a full Status Review of the Big Lost River Whitefish in response to a WWP lawsuit.

Today, the US Fish and Wildlife Service announced that it intends to comply with the judge’s order and conduct the Status Review, a process whereby the federal government determines whether a species qualifies for Endangered Species Act protection.

The Western Watersheds Project first petitioned the Service to list the Big Lost River mountain whitefish in 2006. After reviewing the petition in 2007, the Service determined it did not present substantial information to indicate that listing was warranted. The Western Watersheds Project then filed a complaint in 2008 challenging the Service’s finding. In response to that lawsuit, the United States District Court in Boise, Idaho, directed the Service to conduct a status review of mountain whitefish in the Big Lost River and, within one year, issue a finding on whether the population should be protected as a threatened or endangered species. The court ordered the Service to make a final listing determination by March 31, 2010.

WWP Acts To Protect The Imperiled Montana Grayling In MT And The Big Lost River Whitefish In ID

Monday, November 19th, 2007

Western Watersheds Project Acts To Protect The
Imperiled Montana Grayling In Montana And The Big Lost River Whitefish In Idaho

WWP Online Messenger # 132

Montana Grayling
Montana Grayling Photo © Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks

Western Watersheds Project has joined with the Center for Biological Diversity, the Federation of Fly Fishers, Pat Munday of Butte and former Montana fishing guide and WWP Advisory Board Member George Wuerthner in filing litigation against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for their denial of listing of the remnant population of Montana fluvial grayling. That denial appears to have been the result of interference by the disgraced Bush Department of the Interior official, Julie MacDonald, who has now resigned.

An excellent article about the plight of the Grayling in Montana by famed outdoor writer Ted Williams is to be found in the November/December issue of Fly Rod & Reel and can be downloaded at this webpage.

Separately, WWP has filed a new 60 day Notice of Intent To Sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for its decision not to carry out a status review of the Big Lost River white fish as petitioned by WWP in June 2006. In October 2007 the USFWS denied WWP’s listing petition for the Big Lost River White Fish because in their judgment it does not qualify as a distinct population segment of the species even though it exists only in one isolated sinks river (the Big Lost River in central Idaho) that has been isolated from any other watershed for at least 10,000 years !

In the case of both of these beautiful fish, livestock production that dewaters and degrades the stream and river habitat for these fish is the primary reason for the huge decline in numbers and occupied habitat of both of these imperiled species.

WWP is ably represented in both these cases by Attorney Judi Brawer of Boise, Idaho. Thank you Judi !

Montana Grayling
Big Lost River White Fish Photo © Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Here Are Two Articles About The Grayling Lawsuit:

Grayling ESA Suit Filed

By SCOTT McMILLION
Friday, November 16, 2007

Grayling Decision Draws Suit

By Justin Post
Friday, November 16, 2007

Western Watersheds Project Is A Regional Conservation Organization Working To Protect And Restore Western Watersheds And Wildlife
http://www.westernwatersheds.org
Consider joining Western Watersheds Project yourself or enrolling a friend with a gift membership. Joining is
easy at WWP’s secure online membership page
Printer Friendly